Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1 – Sword vs Spirit (2025) Movie ft. Pawan, Bobby, and Nidhhi
The much-talked-about period action drama Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1 – Sword vs Spirit marks Pawan Kalyan’s big jump into historical films. This movie features an impressive cast including Bobby Deol, Nidhhi Agerwal, Nargis Fakhri, Nora Fatehi and Sathyaraj.
Directed by Krish Jagarlamudi, this film took nearly five years to complete and promised to be a grand epic. Set in the 16th century during Mughal rule, the story follows a Robin Hood-style hero fighting against oppression while searching for the precious Kohinoor diamond.
Plot and Story
Set in the 16th century, the story follows Hari Hara Veera Mallu (Pawan Kalyan), a thief who steals from the rich to help the poor. The plot revolves around his mission to recover the Koh-i-Noor diamond and rescue people from Mughal soldiers.
However, the film struggles with a major problem. The first half sets up the story well, but the second half completely loses track. This creates a jarring experience that makes the 2 hours 43 minutes feel much longer than it should.
Cast Performance
Pawan Kalyan’s performance is hit and miss. I found his acting solid in the first half and a few scenes later, but his inconsistency becomes obvious as the film progresses. The five-year production clearly affected his commitment to the role.
Bobby Deol brings his usual intensity as the antagonist. His screen presence adds weight to the conflict, though I wish the script gave him more to work with.
Nidhhi Agerwal does her best with what she’s given, but like most period dramas, the female characters feel underdeveloped. The supporting cast including Sathyaraj and Anupam Kher provide decent support.
Technical Aspects
The film’s visual grandeur is impressive. The sets and costumes transport you to the Mughal era effectively. Cinematography by Manoj Paramahamsa and Gnana Shekar V.S. captures the period setting beautifully.
But here’s the biggest shock – MM Keeravani’s music is forgettable. Despite being an Oscar winner, the songs lack impact and the background score feels ordinary. This was truly disappointing given the composer’s reputation.
The action sequences work in parts and bring some energy to the film. However, they can’t save the overall weak narrative structure.
Critical Reception
The film has received mostly negative reviews from critics and audiences. Great Andhra gave it just 1.75/5, calling it a Dull Tale, Epic Fail. Most reviewers found it dated and disappointing.
Overseas reviews have been particularly harsh, with some calling it a disaster. The long production time seems to have hurt rather than helped the final product.
What Works and What Doesn’t
What I Liked:
- Visual production and period setting
- Pawan Kalyan’s screen presence in select scenes
- Some action sequences that bring energy
- Costume and production design
What Could Be Better:
- Storytelling between both halves
- Character development and emotional depth
- Music composition despite big expectations
- Screenplay structure and pacing
- Better use of the talented supporting cast
Final Thoughts
I wanted to love Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1. It had everything needed for success – a popular star, skilled director, good technicians, and a promising story. But the film fails to deliver a satisfying experience.
The biggest problem is the disconnect between its two halves. Add forgettable music and inconsistent performances, and you get a disappointing watch. While Pawan Kalyan fans might find some moments to enjoy, the film doesn’t justify its five-year journey or the hype it created.
Rating: 3/5
